The typing of Morganella morgani by bacteriocin production and sensitivity

References

1. Braunstein H., Tomasulo M. 1978; Identification of Proteus morganii and distinction from other Proteus species. American Journal of Clinical Pathology 70:905–908
   [Google Scholar]
2. Coetzee J. N. 1967; Bacteriocinogeny in strains of Providence and Proteus morganii. Nature 213:614–616
   [Google Scholar]
3. Hedges R. W., Datta N., Coetzee J. N., Dennison S. 1973; R factors from Proteus morganii. Journal of General Microbiology 77:249–259
   [Google Scholar]
4. Magheru A. 1923; Recherches experimentales sur le Bacille de Morgan. Comptes rendus des seances de la societe de biolo- gie 89:343–345
   [Google Scholar]
5. Marier R., Valenti A. J., Madri J. A. 1978; Gram negative endocarditis following cystoscopy. Journal of Urology 119:134–137
   [Google Scholar]
6. McMillan S. A. 1972; Bacteriuria of elderly women in hospital: occurrence and drug resistance. Lancet 2:452–455
   [Google Scholar]
7. Morgan H., de R. 1906; Upon the bacteriology of the summer diarrhoea of infants. British Medical Journal 1:908–912
   [Google Scholar]
8. Rauss K. F. 1936; The systematic position of Morgan’s Bacillus. Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology 42:183–192
   [Google Scholar]
9. Rauss K., Voros S. 1959; The biochemical and serological properties of Proteus morganii. Acta Microbiologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae (Budapest) 6:233–248
   [Google Scholar]
10. Rauss K., Voros S. 1967; Five new serotypes of Morganella morganii. Acta Microbiologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae (Budapest) 14:195–198
    [Google Scholar]
11. Rauss K., Puzova H., Dubay L., Velin D., Doliak M., Voros S. 1975; New serotypes of Morganella morganii. Acta Microbiologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae (Budapest) 22:315–321
    [Google Scholar]
12. Schmidt W. C., Jeffries C. D. 1974; Bacteriophage typing of Proteus mirabilis, Proteus vulgaris and Proteus morganii. Applied Microbiology 27:47–53
    [Google Scholar]
13. Senior B. W. 1977a; Typing of Proteus strains by proticine production and sensitivity. Journal of Medical Microbiology 10:7–17
    [Google Scholar]
14. Senior B. W. 1977b; The Dienes phenomenon: identification of the determinants of compatibility. Journal of General Microbiology 102:235–244
    [Google Scholar]
15. Senior B. W. 1979; The special affinity of particular types of Proteus mirabilis for the urinary tract. Journal of Medical Microbiology 12:1–8
    [Google Scholar]
16. Senior B. W. 1983; Proteus morgani is less frequently associated with urinary tract infections than Proteus mirabilis—an explanation. Journal of Medical Microbiology 16:317–322
    [Google Scholar]
17. Senior B. W., Larsson P. 1983; A highly discriminatory multityping scheme for Proteus mirabilis and Proteus vulgaris. Journal of Medical Microbiology 16:193–202
    [Google Scholar]
18. Senior B. W., Leslie D. L. 1986; Rare occurrence of Proteus vulgaris in faeces: a reason for its rare association with urinary tract infections. Journal of Medical Microbiology 21:139–144
    [Google Scholar]
19. Sevin A., Buttiaux R. 1939; The characters and systematic position of Morgan’s bacillus. Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology 49:457–466
    [Google Scholar]
20. Thjotta T. 1920; On the bacillus of Morgan No. 1.—a meta colon-bacillus. Journal of Bacteriology 5:67–77
    [Google Scholar]
21. Tribondeau L., Fichet M. 1916; Note sur les dysenteries des Dardanelles. Annales de L’lnstitut Pasteur (Paris) 30:357–362
    [Google Scholar]
22. Tucci V., Isenberg H. D. 1981; Hospital cluster epidemic with Morganella morganii. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 14:563–566
    [Google Scholar]
23. Williams E. W., Hawkey P. M., Penner J. L., Senior B. W., Barton L. J. 1983; Serious nosocomial infection caused by Morganella morganii and Proteus mirabilis in a cardiac surgery unit. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 18:5–9
    [Google Scholar]