1887

Abstract

Summary

The total blood lymphocyte proliferation assay (TLP) was evaluated as a screening test for infection with and was compared with the tuberculin (Mantoux) skin test. The results of TLP assays performed on 33 patients with tuberculosis and 37 non-tuberculous subjects were compared with results of skin tests performed in the previous year. There was a high correlation between skin test responses and TLP responses to PPD which was statistically significant. The sensitivity, specificity and the predictive value of a positive test were also similar for the skin test and TLP test. These findings suggest that the TLP test is as effective in screening for infection as tuberculin skin testing. Future research leading to further simplification of the TLP method may lead to it replacing intradermal skin testing.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-37-4-283
1992-10-01
2024-05-02
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/37/4/medmicro-37-4-283.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-37-4-283&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Collins F. M. Immunology of tuberculosis. Am Rev Respir Dis 1982; 125:42–49
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Kerby G. R. Correlation of tuberculin skin reaction with in vitro lymphocyte transformation. Am Rev Respir Dis 1968; 97:904–908
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Miller S. D., Jones H. E. Correlation of Lymphocyte transformation with tuberculin skin-test sensitivity. Am Rev Respir Dis 1973; 107:530–538
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cox R. A., Lundberg D. I., Arnold D. R. Lymphocyte transfor mation assays as a diagnostic tool in tuberculosis of children. Am Rev Respir Dis 1981; 123:627–630
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Frankenburg S. A simplified microtechnique for measuring human lymphocyte proliferation after stimulation with mitogen and specific antigen. J Immunol Methods 1988; 112:177–182
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Abramson J. H. Making sense of data: a self-instruction manual on the interpretation of epidemiological data. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1988136
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cochrane A. C., Holland W. W. Validation of screening pro cedures. Br Med Bull 1971; 27:3–8
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Matsanoitis N., Tsenghi C., Economou-Marou C., Stavridaki C. M. Skin hypersensitivity and in vitro lymphocyte reactivity to tuberculin in childhood. J Pediatr 1968; 72:599–605
    [Google Scholar]
  9. McFarland W., Heilman D. H. Comparison of lymphocyte transformation and intradermal reactions to tuberculins. Am Rev Respir Dis 1966; 93:742–748
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Thomas J. W., Naiman S. C., Clements D. Lymphocyte tran sformation by phytohaemagglutinin II in the tuberculous patient. Can Med Assoc J 1967; 97:836–840
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bearman J. E., Kleinman H., Glyer W., La Croix O. M. A study of variability in tuberculin test reading. Am Rev Respir Dis 1964; 90:913–919
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Sokal J. E. Measurement of delayed skin-test responses. N Engl J Med 1975; 293:501–502
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Snider D. E. The. tuberculin skin test. Am Rev Respir Dis 1982; 125:108–118
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-37-4-283
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-37-4-283
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error