Detection of penicillin tolerance in Streptococcus pyogenes

References

1. Dagan R, Feme M. Association of penicillin-tolerant strepto cocci with epidemics of streptococcal pharyngitis in closed communities. Eur J Clin Microbial Infeci Dis 1989; 8:629–631
   [Google Scholar]
2. Grahn E, Holm SE, Roos K. Penicillin tolerance in betastreptococci isolated from patients with tonsillitis. Scand J Infect Dis 1987; 19:421–426
   [Google Scholar]
3. Sherris JC. Problems in in vitro determination of antibiotic tolerance in clinical isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1986; 30:633–637
   [Google Scholar]
4. Woolfrey BF, Lally RT, Gresser-Burns M. Penicillin tolerance in group A streptococci. J Infect Dis 1988; 158:487–488
   [Google Scholar]
5. Mayhall CG, Apollo E. Effect of storage and changes in bacterial growth phase and antibiotic concentrations on antimicrobial tolerance in Staphylococcus aureus. Anti-microb Agents Chemother 1980; 18:784–788
   [Google Scholar]
6. Tuomanen E. Phenotypic tolerance: the search for beta-lactam antibiotics that kill nongrowing bacteria. Rev Infect Dis 1986; 8: Suppl 3S279–S291
   [Google Scholar]
7. James PA. Comparison of four methods for the determination of MIC and MBC of penicillin for viridans streptococci and the implications for penicillin tolerance. J Antimicrob Chemother 1990; 25:209–216
   [Google Scholar]
8. Sabath LD, Wheeler N, Laverdiere M, Blazevic D, Wilkinson BJ. A new type of penicillin resistance of Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet 1977; 1:443–447
   [Google Scholar]
9. Goessens WHF, Fontijne P, Van Raffe M, Michel MF. Tolerance percentage as a criterion for the detection of tolerant Staphylococcus aureus strains. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1984; 25:575–578
   [Google Scholar]
10. Michel MF, Van Leeuwen WB. Degree and stability of tolerance to penicillin in Streptococcus pyogenes. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1989; 8:225–232
    [Google Scholar]
11. Meylan PR, Francioli P, Glauser MP. Discrepancies between MBC and actual killing of viridans group streptococci by cell-wall active antibiotics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1986; 29:418–423
    [Google Scholar]
12. Taylor PC, Schoenknecht FD, Sherris JC, Linner EC. Deter mination of minimum bactericidal concentrations of oxacillin for Staphylococcus aureus: influence and significance of technical factors. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1983; 23:142–150
    [Google Scholar]
13. Woolfrey BF, Lally RT, Ederer MN. Influence of technical factor variations during inoculum preparation on the agar dilution plate-count method for quantitation of Staphylococcus aureus oxacillin persisters. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1986; 30:792–793
    [Google Scholar]
14. Lakshmi TM, Kim KS. A mutant of group A streptococcus resistant to high levels of kanamycin exhibits characteristics of penicillin tolerance in vitro. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1988; 55:93–98
    [Google Scholar]
15. Krasinski K, Hanna B, LaRussa P, Desiderio D. Penicillin tolerant group A streptococci. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 1986; 4:291–297
    [Google Scholar]
16. Dankert J, Holloway Y, Joldersma W, Hess J. Screening for penicillin tolerance in viridans streptococci by a simple disk method. J Clin Microbiol 1982; 16:744–746
    [Google Scholar]
17. Slater GJ, Greenwood D. Detection of penicillin tolerance in streptococci. J Clin Pathol 1983; 36:1353–1356
    [Google Scholar]
18. Kim KS, Anthony BF. Use of penicillin-gradient and replicate plates for the demonstration of tolerance to penicillin in streptococci. J Infect Dis 1983; 148:488–491
    [Google Scholar]
19. Sabath LD, Mokhbat JE. What is the clinical significance of tolerance to β-lactam antibiotics?. In: Remington JS, Schwarz MN. (eds) Current clinical topics in infectious diseases New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company; 1983358–377
    [Google Scholar]
20. Stratton CW. The role of the microbiology laboratory in the treatment of infective endocarditis. J Antimicrob Chemother 1987; 20:Suppl A41–49
    [Google Scholar]
21. Goessens WHF, Fontijne P, Michel MF. Factors influencing detection of tolerance in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1982; 22:364–368
    [Google Scholar]
22. Gilbert P, Collier PHJ, Brown MRW. Influence of growth rate on susceptibility to antimicrobial agents: biofilms, cell cycle, dormancy, and stringent response. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1990; 34:1865–1868
    [Google Scholar]
23. Greenwood D. Phenotypic resistance to antimicrobial agents. J Antimicrob Chemother 1985; 15:653–658
    [Google Scholar]
24. Woolfrey BF, Lally RT, Ederer MN. Evaluation of oxacillin tolerance in Staphylococcus aureus by a novel method. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1985; 28:381–388
    [Google Scholar]
25. Said I, Fletcher H, Volpe A, Daneo-Moore L. Penicillin tolerance in Streptococcusfaecium ATCC 9790. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1987; 31:1150–1152
    [Google Scholar]
26. Moreillon PH, Markiewicz Z, Nachman S. et al. Two bacteri cidal targets for penicillin in pneumococci: autolysis-dependent and autolysis-independent killing mechanisms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1990; 34:33–39
    [Google Scholar]
27. Eagle H, Musselman AD. The rate of bactericidal action of penicillin in vitro as a function of its concentration and its paradoxically reduced activity at high concentrations against certain organisms. J Exp Med 1948; 88:99–131
    [Google Scholar]
28. Shah PM. Paradoxical effect of antibiotics. I. The “Eagle effect”. J Antimicrob Chemother 1982; 10:259–260
    [Google Scholar]