1887

Abstract

Summary

The value of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based DNA fingerprinting and plasmid profile analysis for differentiation of isolates was assessed. Nineteen isolates of were typed by PCR-ribotyping, repetitive extragenic palindromic element (REP)-PCR and enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus (ERIC)-PCR. These methods distinguished five types by PCR-ribotyping, 11 types by REP-PCR and seven types by ERIC-PCR. The ribotyping method produced a relatively simple pattern and a small number of distinct types and was useful for differentiation of from the phenotypically similar organism, . REP- and ERIC-PCR both produced complex banding patterns, but increased the discrimination between strains. Plasmids were found in 12 of the 19 isolates and there were four different plasmid profiles. A combination of the PCR methods and plasmid profile analysis provided a high resolution typing method for .

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-47-11-987
1998-11-01
2024-04-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/47/11/medmicro-47-11-987.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-47-11-987&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Roberts D. S. A new pathogen from ewe with mastitis. Aust Vet J 1956; 32:330–332
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Low J. C., Graham M. M. Histophilus ovis epididymitis in a ram in the UK. Vet Rec 1985; 117:64–65
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Humphrey J. D., Stephens L. R. ‘Haemophilus somnus’: a review. Vet Bull 1983; 53:987–1004
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Webb R. F. Bacteriological characteristics of Histophilus ovis and its relationship to similar bacteria. Res Vet 1983; 35:25–29
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Kirkham C., Biberstein E. L., LeFebvre R. B. Evidence of host-specific subgroups among ‘Histophilus ovis’ isolates. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1989; 39:236–239
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Stephens L. R., Humphrey J. D., Little P. B., Bamum D. A. Morphological, biochemical, antigenic, and cytochemical relationships among Haemophilus somnus, Haemophilus agni, Haemophilus haemoglobinophilus, Histophilus ovis, and Actinobacillus seminis. J Clin Microbiol 1983; 17:728–737
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Ward A. C. S., Jaworski M. D., Eddow J. M., Corbeil L. B. A comparative study of bovine and ovine Haemophilus somnus isolates. Can J Vet Res 1995; 59:173–178
    [Google Scholar]
  8. McGillivery D. J., Webber J. J., Dean H. F. Characterisation of Histophilus ovis and related organisms by restriction endonuclease analysis. Aust Vet J 1986; 63:389–393
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Piechulla K., Mutters R., Burbach S., Klussmeier R., Pohl S., Mannheim W. Deoxyribonucleic acid relationships of ‘Histophilus ovis/Haemophilus somnus’, Haemophilus haemoglobinophilus, and ‘Actinobacillus seminis’. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1986; 36:1–7
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Walker R. L., Biberstein E. L., Pritchett R. F., Kirkham C. Deoxy-ribonucleic acid relatedness among ‘Haemophilus somnus’, ‘Haemophilus agni’, ‘Histophilus ovis’, ‘Actinobacillus seminis’, and Haemophilus influenzae. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1985; 35:46–49
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kerr K. G. The rap on REP-PCR-based typing systems. Rev Med Microbiol 1994; 5:233–244
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Lupski J. R., Weinstock G. M. Short, interspersed repetitive DNA sequences in prokaryotic genomes. J Bacteriol 1992; 174:4525–4529
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Sharpies G. J., Lloyd R. G. A novel repeated DNA sequence located in the intergenic regions of bacterial chromosomes. Nucleic Acids Res 1990; 18:6503–6508
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Versalovic J., Koeuth T., Lupski J. R. Distribution of repetitive DNA sequences in eubacteria and application to fingerprinting of bacterial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 1991; 19:6823–6831
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Jensen M. A., Webster J. A., Straus N. Rapid identification of bacteria on the basis of polymerase chain-reaction amplified ribosomal DNA spacer polymorphisms. Appl Environ Microbiol 1993; 59:945–952
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Appuhamy S., Parton R., Coote J. G., Gibbs H. A. Genomic fingerprinting of Haemophilus somnus by a combination of PCR methods. J Clin Microbiol 1997; 35:288–291
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Appuhamy S., Coote J. G., Low J. C., Parton R. PCR methods for rapid identification and characterization of Actinobacillus seminis strains. J Clin Microbiol 1998; 36:814–817
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Cousins D. V., Lloyd J. M. Rapid identification of Haemophilus somnus Histophilus ovis and Actinobacillus seminis using the API ZYM system. Vet Microbiol 1988; 17:75–81
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Gürtler V., Stanisich V. A. New approaches to typing and identification of bacteria using the 16S-23S rDNA spacer region. Microbiology 1996; 142:3–16
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Fussing V., Wegener H. C. Characterization of bovine Haemophilus somnus by biotyping, plasmid profiling, REA-patterns and ribotyping. Int J Med Microbiol Virol Parasitol Infect Dis 1993; 279:60–74
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Appuhamy S. DNA fingerprinting of Haemophilus somnus, Histophilus ovis and Actinobacillus seminis. PhD thesis University of Glasgow; 1997
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Myers L. E., Silva S. V. P. S., Procunier J. D., Little P. B. Genomic fingerprinting of ‘Haemophilus somnus’ isolates by using a random-amplified polymorphic DNA assay. J Clin Microbiol 1993; 31:512–517
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-47-11-987
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-47-11-987
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error