1887

Abstract

Avian colibacillosis is responsible for economic losses to poultry producers worldwide. To combat this, we aimed to develop an effective oral vaccine for chicken against O78 avian pathogenic (APEC) infection through a delivery system.

Eight strains isolated from the intestines of broiler chickens were evaluated based on their adherence ability to assess their potential as a delivery vector. Fimbrial subunit A (FimA) and outer-membrane protein C (OmpC) of APEC with and without fusion to dendritic cell-targeting peptide (DCpep) and microfold cell-targeting peptide (Co1) were displayed on the surface of M-11 and yielded vaccine groups (pPG-ompC-fimA/M-11 and pPG-ompC-fimA-Co1-DCpep/M-11, respectively). The colonization of the recombinant strains was assessed and the immunogenicity and protective efficacy of orally administered recombinant strains in chickens were evaluated.

The colonization of the recombinant strains revealed no significant differences between the recombinant and wild-type strains. Chickens orally administered with vaccine groups showed significantly higher levels of OmpC/FimA-specific IgG in serum and mucosal IgA in cecum lavage, nasal lavage and stool compared to the pPG/M-11 group. After challenge with APEC CVCC1553, better protective efficacy was observed in chickens orally immunized with pPG-ompC-fimA/M-11 and pPG-ompC-fimA-Co1-DCpep/M-11, but no significant differences were observed between the two groups.

Recombinant chicken-borne M-11 showed good immunogenicity in chickens, suggesting that it may be a promising vaccine candidate against APEC infections. However, the activity of mammalian DCpep and Co1 was not significant in chickens.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.000679
2018-03-01
2024-05-01
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/67/3/441.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.000679&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Vandekerchove D, de Herdt P, Laevens H, Pasmans F. Colibacillosis in caged layer hens: characteristics of the disease and the aetiological agent. Avian Pathol 2004; 33:117–125 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Dziva F, Stevens MP. Colibacillosis in poultry: unravelling the molecular basis of virulence of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli in their natural hosts. Avian Pathol 2008; 37:355–366 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Dho-Moulin M, Fairbrother JM. Avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC). Vet Res 1999; 30:299–316[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Janben T, Schwarz C, Preikschat P, Voss M, Philipp HC et al. Virulence-associated genes in avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) isolated from internal organs of poultry having died from colibacillosis. Int J Med Microbiol 2001; 291:371–378[PubMed] [Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Liu C, Chen Z, Tan C, Liu W, Xu Z et al. Immunogenic characterization of outer membrane porins OmpC and OmpF of porcine extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli . FEMS Microbiol Lett 2012; 337:104–111 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Liu YF, Yan JJ, Lei HY, Teng CH, Wang MC et al. Loss of outer membrane protein C in Escherichia coli contributes to both antibiotic resistance and escaping antibody-dependent bactericidal activity. Infect Immun 2012; 80:1815–1822 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Nart P, Holden N, McAteer SP, Wang D, Flockhart AF et al. Mucosal antibody responses of colonized cattle to Escherichia coli O157-secreted proteins, flagellin, outer membrane proteins and lipopolysaccharide. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2008; 52:59–68 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Yu S, Zhang Q, Shui X, Yu Z, Zhao B. Cloning, expression and immunity of pilA gene and ompC gene from avian pathogenic Escherichia coli . Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao 2008; 24:1561–1567 (in Chinese) [PubMed] [Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Fajardo P, Pastrana L, Méndez J, Rodríguez I, Fuciños C et al. Effects of feeding of two potentially probiotic preparations from lactic acid bacteria on the performance and faecal microflora of broiler chickens. Sci World J 2012; 2012:1–9 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Giannenas I, Tsalie E, Triantafillou E, Hessenberger S, Teichmann K et al. Assessment of probiotics supplementation via feed or water on the growth performance, intestinal morphology and microflora of chickens after experimental infection with Eimeria acervulina, Eimeria maxima and Eimeria tenella . Avian Pathol 2014; 43:209–216 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Yu M, Qi R, Chen C, Yin J, Ma S, St M et al. Immunogenicity of recombinant Lactobacillus casei-expressing F4 (K88) fimbrial adhesin FaeG in conjunction with a heat-labile enterotoxin A (LTAK63) and heat-labile enterotoxin B (LTB) of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli as an oral adjuvant in mice. J Appl Microbiol 2017; 122:506–515 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Sakaridis I, Soultos N, Dovas CI, Papavergou E, Ambrosiadis I et al. Lactic acid bacteria from chicken carcasses with inhibitory activity against Salmonella spp. and Listeria monocytogenes . Anaerobe 2012; 18:62–66 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Huang IF, Lin IC, Liu PF, Cheng MF, Liu YC et al. Lactobacillus acidophilus attenuates Salmonella-induced intestinal inflammation via TGF-β signaling. BMC Microbiol 2015; 15:203 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kajikawa A, Igimi S. Innate and acquired immune responses induced by recombinant Lactobacillus casei displaying flagellin-fusion antigen on the cell-surface. Vaccine 2010; 28:3409–3415 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kajikawa A, Satoh E, Leer RJ, Yamamoto S, Igimi S. Intragastric immunization with recombinant Lactobacillus casei expressing flagellar antigen confers antibody-independent protective immunity against Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis. Vaccine 2007; 25:3599–3605 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Balzaretti S, Taverniti V, Rondini G, Marcolegio G, Minuzzo M et al. The vaginal isolate Lactobacillus paracasei LPC-S01 (DSM 26760) is suitable for oral administration. Front Microbiol 2015; 6:952 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Shimazu T, Villena J, Tohno M, Fujie H, Hosoya S et al. Immunobiotic Lactobacillus jensenii elicits anti-inflammatory activity in porcine intestinal epithelial cells by modulating negative regulators of the Toll-like receptor signaling pathway. Infect Immun 2012; 80:276–288 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Burns RB, Maxwell MH. Ultrastructure of Peyer's patches in the domestic fowl and turkey. J Anat 1986; 147:35–243[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Wu Z, Rothwell L, Young JR, Kaufman J, Butter C et al. Generation and characterization of chicken bone marrow-derived dendritic cells. Immunology 2010; 129:133–145 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Mohamadzadeh M, Duong T, Sandwick SJ, Hoover T, Klaenhammer TR. Dendritic cell targeting of Bacillus anthracis protective antigen expressed by Lactobacillus acidophilus protects mice from lethal challenge. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106:4331–4336 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Owen JL, Sahay B, Mohamadzadeh M. New generation of oral mucosal vaccines targeting dendritic cells. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2013; 17:918–924 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kim SH, Seo KW, Kim J, Lee KY, Jang YS. The M cell-targeting ligand promotes antigen delivery and induces antigen-specific immune responses in mucosal vaccination. J Immunol 2010; 185:5787–5795 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Li YJ, Han LM, Tang LJ, Ma ST, Jiang YP et al. Separation and identification of colonized lactobacillus from chickens intestine and analysis of antibiotics susceptibility. J Northeast Agric Univ 2016; 47:51–59 (in Chinese)
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Song BF, Ju LZ, Li YJ, Tang LJ. Chromosomal insertions in the Lactobacillus casei upp gene that are useful for vaccine expression. Appl Environ Microbiol 2014; 80:3321–3326 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Bouzaine T, Dauphin RD, Thonart P, Urdaci MC, Hamdi M. Adherence and colonization properties of Lactobacillus rhamnosus TB1, a broiler chicken isolate. Lett Appl Microbiol 2005; 40:391–396 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Song L, Cui H, Tang L, Qiao X, Liu M et al. Construction of upp deletion mutant strains of Lactobacillus casei and Lactococcus lactis based on counterselective system using temperature-sensitive plasmid. J Microbiol Methods 2014; 102:37–44 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Fuller ME, Streger SH, Rothmel RK, Mailloux BJ, Hall JA et al. Development of a vital fluorescent staining method for monitoring bacterial transport in subsurface environments. Appl Environ Microbiol 2000; 66:4486–4496 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Xu Y, Cui L, Tian C, Zhang G, Huo G et al. Immunogenicity of recombinant classic swine fever virus CD8(+) T lymphocyte epitope and porcine parvovirus VP2 antigen coexpressed by Lactobacillus casei in swine via oral vaccination. Clin Vaccine Immunol 2011; 18:1979–1986 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Lin J, Kang H, Liang J, Fu J, Yu Q et al. CpG oligonucleotides and astragalus polysaccharides are effective adjuvants in cultures of avian bone-marrow-derived dendritic cells. Br Poult Sci 2015; 56:30–38 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Zeuthen LH, Christensen HR, Frøkiaer H. Lactic acid bacteria inducing a weak interleukin-12 and tumor necrosis factor alpha response in human dendritic cells inhibit strongly stimulating lactic acid bacteria but act synergistically with Gram-negative bacteria. Clin Vaccine Immunol 2006; 13:365–375 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Harry EG, Hemsley LA. The relationship between environmental contamination with septicaemia strains of Escherichia coli and their incidence in chickens. Vet Rec 1965; 77:241–245[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Dominick MA, Jensen AE. Colonization and persistence of Escherichia coli in axenic and monoxenic turkeys. Am J Vet Res 1984; 45:2331–2335[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Leitner G, Heller ED. Colonization of Escherichia coli in young turkeys and chickens. Avian Dis 1992; 36:211–220 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Dozois CM, Pourbakhsh SA, Fairbrother JM. Expression of P and type 1 (F1) fimbriae in pathogenic Escherichia coli from poultry. Vet Microbiol 1995; 45:297–309 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Garcia JR, Gerardo NM. The symbiont side of symbiosis: do microbes really benefit?. Front Microbiol 2014; 5:510 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Alarcon I, Kwan L, Yu C, Evans DJ, Fleiszig SM. Role of the corneal epithelial basement membrane in ocular defense against Pseudomonas aeruginosa . Infect Immun 2009; 77:3264–3271 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Horie M, Ishiyama A, Fujihira-Ueki Y, Sillanpää J, Korhonen TK et al. Inhibition of the adherence of Escherichia coli strains to basement membrane by Lactobacillus crispatus expressing an S-layer. J Appl Microbiol 2002; 92:396–403 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Casteleyn C, Doom M, Lambrechts E, van den Broeck W, Simoens P et al. Locations of gut-associated lymphoid tissue in the 3-month-old chicken: a review. Avian Pathol 2010; 39:143–150 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Yurong Y, Ruiping S, Shimin Z, Yibao J. Effect of probiotics on intestinal mucosal immunity and ultrastructure of cecal tonsils of chickens. Arch Anim Nutr 2005; 59:237–246 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Kaiser P. Advances in avian immunology–prospects for disease control: a review. Avian Pathol 2010; 39:309–324 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.000679
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.000679
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary File 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error