1887

Abstract

This study used a previously described multiplex PCR-based reverse line blot (mPCR/RLB) assay to assess the prevalence and distribution of 14 urogenital pathogens or putative pathogens, namely , , , , , , , , , , , herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2, and human adenovirus. First-voided urine specimens and endocervical and self-collected vaginal swabs from each of 216 women attending three sexual health clinics in Sydney, Australia, were tested and the results were compared with those of reference methods for each organism. One hundred and sixty-eight women (77.7 %) had at least one and 105 (48.6 %) had more than one target organism, most commonly and spp. The prevalence of each of the four known sexually transmissible pathogens was <5 %. Of the 216 women, 111 (51.4 %) reported at least one symptom consistent with genital or urethral infection, including discharge, pain or discomfort. Only was detected more frequently in women with symptoms ( = 0.05). The specificity of the mPCR/RLB assay compared with that of the reference methods for each organism and for all specimen types was 100 %. The mean sensitivities of the mPCR/RLB assay compared with those of the reference methods for self-collected vaginal swabs, cervical swabs and first-voided urine specimens for all organisms were 99.3, 98.1 and 84.6 %, respectively; however, these differences were not significant. There were no differences in sensitivities between specimen types for , , and , although all were found infrequently. Overall, the mPCR/RLB platform was found to be an accurate testing platform in a sexual health clinic setting.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.029108-0
2011-07-01
2024-04-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/60/7/1010.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.029108-0&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bradshaw C. S., Tabrizi S. N., Read T. R., Garland S. M., Hopkins C. A., Moss L. M., Fairley C. K. 2006; Etiologies of nongonococcal urethritis: bacteria, viruses, and the association with orogenital exposure. J Infect Dis 193:336–345 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Couldwell D. L., Gidding H. F., Freedman E. V., McKechnie M. L., Biggs K., Sintchenko V., Gilbert G. L. 2010; Ureaplasma urealyticum is significantly associated with non-gonococcal urethritis in heterosexual Sydney men. Int J STD AIDS 21:337–341 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. de Visser R. O., Smith A. M., Rissel C. E., Richters J., Grulich A. E. 2003; Sex in Australia: heterosexual experience and recent heterosexual encounters among a representative sample of adults. Aust N Z J Public Health 27:146–154 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Foo C., Browne R., Boag F. 2004; Retrospective review of the correlation of symptoms, signs and microscopy with the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis in men. Int J STD AIDS 15:319–321 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Fox K. K., Isbey S. F., Cohen M. S. 1999; Urethritis, epidydimitis, orchitis, prostatitis. In Clinical Infectious Diseases: a Practical Approach pp. 669–679 Edited by Root R. K., Corey L., Stamm W. E. New York: Oxford University Press;
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Garrow S. C., Smith D. W., Harnett G. B. 2002; The diagnosis of chlamydia, gonorrhoea, and trichomonas infections by self obtained low vaginal swabs, in remote northern Australian clinical practice. Sex Transm Infect 78:278–281 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Hocking J. S., Lim M. S., Vidanapathirana J., Read T. R., Hellard M. 2006; Chlamydia testing in general practice – a survey of Victorian general practitioners. Sex Health 3:241–244 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Jensen J. S., Björnelius E., Dohn B., Lidbrink P. 2004; Comparison of first void urine and urogenital swab specimens for detection of Mycoplasma genitalium and Chlamydia trachomatis by polymerase chain reaction in patients attending a sexually transmitted disease clinic. Sex Transm Dis 31:499–507 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Manhart L. E., Holmes K. K., Hughes J. P., Houston L. S., Totten P. A. 2007; Mycoplasma genitalium among young adults in the United States: an emerging sexually transmitted infection. Am J Public Health 97:1118–1125 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. McKechnie M. L., Hillman R., Couldwell D., Kong F., Freedman E., Wang H., Gilbert G. L. 2009; Simultaneous identification of 14 genital microorganisms in urine by use of a multiplex PCR-based reverse line blot assay. J Clin Microbiol 47:1871–1877 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Nelson D. B., Bellamy S., Gray T. S., Nachamkin I. 2003; Self-collected versus provider-collected vaginal swabs for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis: an assessment of validity and reliability. J Clin Epidemiol 56:862–866 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Richters J., Grulich A. E., de Visser R. O., Smith A. M., Rissel C. E. 2003; Sex in Australia: contraceptive practices among a representative sample of women. Aust N Z J Public Health 27:210–216 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Rose S. B., Lawton B. A., Bromhead C., MacDonald E. J., Lund K. A. 2007; Self-obtained vaginal swabs for PCR chlamydia testing: a practical alternative. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 47:415–418 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Rosenstein I. J., Morgan D. J., Sheehan M., Lamont R. F., Taylor-Robinson D. 1996; Bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy: distribution of bacterial species in different Gram-stain categories of the vaginal flora. J Med Microbiol 45:120–126 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Schachter J., McCormack W. M., Chernesky M. A., Martin D. H., Van Der Pol B., Rice P. A., Hook E. W. III, Stamm W. E., Quinn T. C., Chow J. M. 2003; Vaginal swabs are appropriate specimens for diagnosis of genital tract infection with Chlamydia trachomatis . J Clin Microbiol 41:3784–3789 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Simms I., Warburton F., Weström L. 2003; Diagnosis of pelvic inflammatory disease: time for a rethink. Sex Transm Infect 79:491–494 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Skidmore S., Horner P., Herring A., Sell J., Paul I., Thomas J., Caul E. O., Egger M., McCarthy A. et al. 2006; Vulvovaginal-swab or first-catch urine specimen to detect Chlamydia trachomatis in women in a community setting?. J Clin Microbiol 44:4389–4394 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Stamm W. E. 1993; Toward control of sexually transmitted chlamydial infections. Ann Intern Med 119:432–434[PubMed] [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Tanaka M., Nakayama H., Yoshida H., Takahashi K., Nagafuji T., Hagiwara T., Kumazawa J. 1998; Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in vaginal specimens from female commercial sex workers using a new improved enzyme immunoassay. Sex Transm Infect 74:435–438 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Thomas B. J., Pierpoint T., Taylor-Robinson D., Renton A. M. 1998; Sensitivity of the ligase chain reaction assay for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis in vaginal swabs from women who are infected at other sites. Sex Transm Infect 74:140–141 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Vajdic C. M., Middleton M., Bowden F. J., Fairley C. K., Kaldor J. M. 2005; The prevalence of genital Chlamydia trachomatis in Australia 1997-2004: a systematic review. Sex Health 2:169–183 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Volgmann T., Ohlinger R., Panzig B. 2005; Ureaplasma urealyticum – harmless commensal or underestimated enemy of human reproduction? A review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 273:133–139 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Wang J. 2000; Bacterial vaginosis. Prim Care Update Ob Gyns 7:181–185 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. WHO 2007; Fact Sheet No 110: Sexually Transmitted Infections. Geneva: World Health Organization;
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.029108-0
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.029108-0
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error