1887

Abstract

is the cause of one of the most common types of vaginitis, trichomoniasis. The incidence of trichomoniasis in developed countries has decreased substantially during the past decade, but high prevalence of this disease can still be found in rural and remote areas of Australia. Clinical manifestations of symptomatic women are generally non-specific, but include vaginal discharge, vaginitis and irritation. infection has also been linked to the increased risk of human immunodeficiency virus transmission. Current diagnosis of relies on the visualization of motile organisms in a wet-mount preparation. Culture is used mainly in reference laboratories. The latter two methods require viable organisms and would not be suitable for use where transportation of specimens can be delayed. Two real-time fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) hybridization probe PCR assays were used in this study to test for DNA, targeting the -tubulin and 18S rRNA genes. We tested 500 randomly selected female patients, in an STD setting, for DNA. The FRET PCRs targeting the -tubulin gene and the 18S rRNA gene detected 96 % (85/89) and 100 % (89/89) , respectively, of the positive specimens (first-void urine sample or genital swabs). Wet-mount microscopy was performed on 76 of these PCR-positive specimens and showed a sensitivity of 38 % (29/76). The prevalence, by PCR, of trichomoniasis was 18 % in this study. The two real-time PCRs developed in this study, targeting different genetic regions of the organism, provide a rapid, sensitive and specific diagnosis of infection.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.47163-0
2007-06-01
2024-04-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/56/6/772.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.47163-0&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Borchardt K. A., Zhang M. Z., Shing H., Flink K. 1997; A comparison of the sensitivity of the InPouch TV, Diamond's and Trichosel media for detection of Trichomonas vaginalis . Genitourin Med 73:297–298
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bowden F. J., Garnett G. P. 2000; Trichomonas vaginalis epidemiology: parameterising and analysing a model of treatment interventions. Sex Transm Infect 76:248–256 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bowden F. J., Paterson B. A., Mein J., Savage J., Fairley C. K., Garland S. M., Tabrizi S. N. 1999; Estimating the prevalence of Trichomonas vaginalis , Chlamydia trachomatis , Neisseria gonorrhoeae , and human papillomavirus infection in indigenous women in northern Australia. Sex Transm Infect 75:431–434 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Burrows J., Nitsche A., Bayly B., Walker E., Higgins G., Kok T. 2002; Detection and subtyping of Herpes simplex virus in clinical samples by LightCycler PCR, enzyme immunoassay and cell culture. BMC Microbiol 2:12–18 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Caliendo A. M., Jordan J. A., Green A. M., Ingersoll J., Diclemente R. J., Wingood G. M. 2005; Real-time PCR improves detection of Trichomonas vaginalis infection compared with culture using self-collected vaginal swabs. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 13:145–150 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hardick J., Yang S., Lin S., Duncan D., Gaydos C. 2003; Use of the Roche LightCycler instrument in a real-time PCR for Trichomonas vaginalis in urine samples from females and males. J Clin Microbiol 41:5619–5622 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Jordan J. A., Lowery D., Trucco M. 2001; TaqMan-based detection of Trichomonas vaginalis DNA from female genital specimens. J Clin Microbiol 39:3819–3822 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Kengne P., Veas F., Vidal N., Rey J. L., Cuny G. 1994; Trichomonas vaginalis : repeated DNA target for highly sensitive and specific polymerase chain reaction diagnosis. Cell Mol Biol 40:819–831
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Knox J., Tabrizi S. N., Miller P., Petoumenos K., Law M., Chen S., Garland S. M. 2002; Evaluation of self-collected samples in contrast to practitioner-collected samples for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis , Neisseria gonorrhoeae , and Trichomonas vaginalis by polymerase chain reaction among women living in remote areas. Sex Transm Dis 29:647–654 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Lawing L. F., Hedges S. R., Schwebke J. R. 2000; Detection of trichomonosis in vaginal and urine specimens from women by culture and PCR. J Clin Microbiol 38:3585–3588
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Madico G., Quinn T. C., Rompalo A., McKee K. T. Jr, Gaydos C. A. 1998; Diagnosis of Trichomonas vaginalis infection by PCR using vaginal swab samples. J Clin Microbiol 36:3205–3210
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Mayta H., Gilman R. H., Calderon M. M., Gottlieb A., Soto G., Tuero I., Sanchez S., Vivar A. 2000; 18S ribosomal DNA-based PCR for diagnosis of Trichomonas vaginalis . J Clin Microbiol 38:2683–2687
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Paces J., Urbankova V., Urbanek P. 1992; Cloning and characterization of a repetitive DNA sequence specific for Trichomonas vaginalis . Mol Biochem Parasitol 54:247–255 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Petrin D., Delgaty K., Bhatt R., Garber G. 1998; Clinical and microbiological aspects of Trichomonas vaginalis . Clin Microbiol Rev 11:300–317
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Radonjic I. V., Dzamic A. M., Mitrovic S. M., Arsic Arsenijevic V. S., Popadic D. M., Kranjcic Zec I. F. 2006; Diagnosis of Trichomonas vaginalis infection: the sensitivities and specificities of microscopy, culture and PCR assay. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 126:116–120 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Ryu J. S., Chung H. L., Min D. Y., Cho Y. H., Ro Y. S., Kim S. R. 1999; Diagnosis of trichomoniasis by polymerase chain reaction. Yonsei Med J 40:56–60 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Schwebke J. R. 2005; Trichomoniasis in adolescents: a marker for the lack of a public health response to the epidemic of sexually transmitted diseases in the United States. J Infect Dis 192:2036–2038 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Schwebke J. R., Burgess D. 2004; Trichomoniasis. Clin Microbiol Rev 17:794–803 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Smith K. S., Tabrizi S. N., Fethers K. A., Knox J. B., Pearce C., Garland S. M. 2005; Comparison of conventional testing to polymerase chain reaction in detection of Trichomonas vaginalis in indigenous women living in remote areas. Int J STD AIDS 16:811–815 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Soper D. 2004; Trichomoniasis: under control or undercontrolled?. Am J Obstet Gynecol 190:281–290 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Stone B., Burrows J., Schepetiuk S., Higgins G., Hampson A., Shaw R., Kok T. 2004; Rapid detection and simultaneous subtype differentiation of influenza A viruses by real time PCR. J Virol Methods 117:103–112 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Van Der Pol B., Williams J. A., Orr D. P., Batteiger B. E., Fortenberry J. D. 2005; Prevalence, incidence, natural history, and response to treatment of Trichomonas vaginalis infection among adolescent women. J Infect Dis 192:2039–2044 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. van der Schee C., van Belkum A., Zwijgers L., van der Brugge E., O'Neill E. L., Luijendijk A., van Rijsoort-Vos T., van der Meijden W. I., Verbrugh H., Sluiters H. J. F. 1999; Improved diagnosis of Trichomonas vaginalis infection by PCR using vaginal swabs and urine specimens compared to diagnosis by wet-mount microscopy, culture, and fluorescent staining. J Clin Microbiol 37:4127–4130
    [Google Scholar]
  24. WHO 1995; An overview of selected curable sexually transmitted diseases. In Global Program on AIDS pp 2–27 Geneva: World Health Organisation;
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.47163-0
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.47163-0
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error