1887

Abstract

Eight swarming motile bacteria were isolated from food and clinical samples in China. Cells were Gram-stain-negative, facultatively anaerobic and rod-shaped (0.5-0.8×1.0-3.0 μm) with hairlike pili and flagella. The 16S rRNA and partial rpoB housekeeping gene sequence analyses indicated that the strains belong to the genus Proteus in the family Enterobacteriaceae . Of the eight strains studied, seven and a single isolate formed two separate clades in the phylogeny of Proteus species, indicating two separate species. Both the in silico DNA–DNA hybridization and the average nucleotide identity values between these two groups and to the type strains of the genus Proteus were below the recommended threshold for signifying their candidature as two separate species. The DNA G+C contents of strains TJ1636 and FJ2001126-3 were 37.8 and 38.1 mol%, respectively. The major cellular fatty acids of the two novel type strains were C16:0, cyclo C17:0, summed feature 3 and summed feature 8. The results supported that the strains belong to different taxonomic positions in the genus Proteus . The isolates were named Proteus faecis sp. nov., with type strain TJ1636 (=DSM 106180=GDMCC 1.1245), and Proteus cibi sp. nov., with type strain FJ2001126-3 (=DSM 106178 =GDMCC 1.1244).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003248
2019-01-21
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/69/3/852.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003248&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Hauser G. U¨ ber fa¨ulnissbacterien und deren beziehungen zur septicamie. Ein betrag zur morphologie der spaltpilze Vogel, Leipzig, Germany: 1885
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Hickman FW, Steigerwalt AG, Farmer JJ, Brenner DJ. Identification of Proteus penneri sp. nov., formerly known as Proteus vulgaris indole negative or as Proteus vulgaris biogroup 1. J Clin Microbiol 1982; 15:1097–1102[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. O'Hara CM, Brenner FW, Miller JM. Classification, identification, and clinical significance of Proteus, Providencia, and Morganella. Clin Microbiol Rev 2000; 13:534–546 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Behrendt U, Augustin J, Spröer C, Gelbrecht J, Schumann P et al. Taxonomic characterisation of Proteus terrae sp. nov., a N2O-producing, nitrate-ammonifying soil bacterium. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2015; 108:1457–1468 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Hyun DW, Jung MJ, Kim MS, Shin NR, Kim PS et al. Proteus cibarius sp. nov., a swarming bacterium from Jeotgal, a traditional Korean fermented seafood, and emended description of the genus Proteus. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:2158–2164 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Dai H, Wang Y, Fang Y, Xiao T, Huang Z et al. Proteus columbae sp. nov., isolated from a pigeon in Ma'anshan, China. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:552–557 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Dai H, Wang Y, Fang Y, Huang Z, Kan B et al. Proteus alimentorum sp. nov., isolated from pork and lobster in Ma'anshan city, China. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:1390–1395 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. O'Hara CM, Brenner FW, Steigerwalt AG, Hill BC, Holmes B et al. Classification of Proteus vulgaris biogroup 3 with recognition of Proteus hauseri sp. nov., nom. rev. and unnamed Proteus genomospecies 4, 5 and 6. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2000; 50 Pt 5:1869–1875 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Drzewiecka D. Significance and roles of Proteus spp. bacteria in natural environments. Microb Ecol 2016; 72:741–758 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Geerlings SE. Clinical presentations and epidemiology of urinary tract infections. Microbiol Spectr 2016; 4: [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Senior BW, Leslie DL. Rare occurrence of Proteus vulgaris in faeces: a reason for its rare association with urinary tract infections. J Med Microbiol 1986; 21:139–144 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Penner JL, Harder W. The genera Proteus, Providencia and Morganella. In Balows A, Trüper HG, Schleifer KH. (editors) The Prokaryotes vol. III Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag KG; 1992 pp. 2849–2853
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kim SJ, Park SJ, Oh YS, Lee SA, Shin KS et al. Shewanella arctica sp. nov., an iron-reducing bacterium isolated from Arctic marine sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:1128–1133 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Jin D, Chen C, Li L, Lu S, Li Z et al. Dynamics of fecal microbial communities in children with diarrhea of unknown etiology and genomic analysis of associated Streptococcus lutetiensis. BMC Microbiol 2013; 13:141 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Giammanco GM, Grimont PA, Grimont F, Lefevre M, Giammanco G et al. Phylogenetic analysis of the genera Proteus, Morganella and Providencia by comparison of rpoB gene sequences of type and clinical strains suggests the reclassification of Proteus myxofaciens in a new genus, Cosenzaea gen. nov., as Cosenzaea myxofaciens comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:1638–1644 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Mollet C, Drancourt M, Raoult D. rpoB sequence analysis as a novel basis for bacterial identification. Mol Microbiol 1997; 26:1005–1011 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 2013; 30:2725–2729 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 1994; 22:4673–4680 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. van Dijk EL, Jaszczyszyn Y, Thermes C. Library preparation methods for next-generation sequencing: tone down the bias. Exp Cell Res 2014; 322:12–20 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:461–466 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Lee I, Ouk Kim Y, Park SC, Chun J. OrthoANI: An improved algorithm and software for calculating average nucleotide identity. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:1100–1103 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Qin QL, Xie BB, Zhang XY, Chen XL, Zhou BC et al. A proposed genus boundary for the prokaryotes based on genomic insights. J Bacteriol 2014; 196:2210–2215 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Sasser M. Identification of bacteria by gas chromatography of cellular fatty acids.. Midi Technical Note 2001101
    [Google Scholar]
  25. CLSI Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; twenty-fourth informational supplement. CLSI document M100-S24 2014
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003248
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003248
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary File 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error