1887

Abstract

Summary

The preformed (constitutive) enzyme profiles of 30 type strains and reference strains of gram-positive anaerobic cocci were determined with two commercial systems, RapID ANA and a prototype system from API. Both systems identified and accurately, except for one strain of misidentified as by the RapID ANA system. The indole-negative, butyrate-producing cocci (classified at present as and Ps.tetradius) produced several different, unique patterns with the prototype API system, but the results with RapID ANA were often misleading. Eight strains of Hare group cocci produced previously described profiles. Four strains of streptococci produced profiles easily distinguished from those of the gram-positive anaerobic cocci. We conclude that most gram-positive anaerobic cocci can be identified rapidly and reliably to the species level by their preformed enzyme profiles, providing that their underlying classification is sound. Problems were encountered with the butyrate-producing cocci, which appear to be a more heterogeneous group of organisms than is currently acknowledged; further taxonomic studies on these organisms are required.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-27-1-65
1988-09-01
2024-04-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/27/1/medmicro-27-1-65.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-27-1-65&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bourgault Rosenblatt J. E., Fitzgerald R. H. 1980; Peptococcus magnus; a significant human pathogen. Annals of Internal Medicine 93:244
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ezaki T., Yamamoto N., Ninomiya K., Suzuki S., Yabuuchi E. 1983; Transfer of Peptococcus indolicus, Peptococcus asaccharolyticus, Peptococcus prevotii and Peptococcus magnus to the genus Peptostreptococcus and proposal of Peptostrepto-coccus tetradius sp. nov. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology 33:683
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Gorbach S. L. 1985; Anaerobic cocci. In Mandell G. L. (eds) The principles and practice of infectious diseases 2nd edn John Wiley; New York: pp 1373–1375
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Hare R., Wildy P., Billett F. S., Twort D. N. 1952; The anaerobic cocci: gas formation, fermentation reactions, sensitivity to antibiotics and sulphonamides. Classification. Journal of Hygiene 50:295–319
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Hare R. 1967; The anaerobic cocci. In Waterson A. P. (ed) Recent advances in medical microbiology Churchill; London: pp 284–317
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Holdeman L. V., Cato E. P., Moore W. E. C. 1977; Anaerobic laboratory manual. 4th edn Anaerobe Laboratories; Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA:
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Huss Festl H., Schleifer K. H. 1984; Nucleic acid hybridization studies and deoxyribonucleic acid base compositions of anaerobic gram-positive cocci. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology 34:95–101
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Murdoch D. A., Mitchelmorel J., Tabaqchali S. 1988; Identification of gram positive anaerobic cocci by use of systems for detecting preformed enzymes. Journal of Medical Microbiology 27:65–70
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Sutter V. L., Citron D. M., Finegold S. M. 1985; Wadsworth anaerobic bacteriology manual. 4th edn Star Publishing Co.; Los Angeles, CA, USA:
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Weiss N. 1981; Cell wall structure of anaerobic cocci. Revue de I’Institut Pasteur de Lyon 14:53–59
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Wren M. W. D., Baldwin A. W. F., Eldon C. P., Sanderson P. J. 1977; The anaerobic culture of clinical specimens: a 14 month study. Journal of Medical Microbiology 10:49–61
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-27-1-65
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-27-1-65
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error