Nucleolar accumulation of Semliki Forest virus nucleocapsid C protein : influence of metabolic status, cytoskeleton and receptors

References

1. McLachlan A, Milich DR Raney AK et al. Expression of hepatitis B virus surface and core antigens : influences of pre-S and precore sequences. J Virol 1987; 61:683–692
   [Google Scholar]
2. Yamauchi M, Nishiyama Y, Fujioka H, Isomura S, Maeno K. On the intracellular transport and the nuclear association of human cytomegalovirus structural proteins. J Gen Virol 1985; 66:675–684
   [Google Scholar]
3. Michel MR, Elgizoli M, Dai Y, Jakob R, Koblet H, Arrigo AP. Karyophilic properties of Semliki Forest virus nucleo-capsid protein. J Virol 1990; 64:5123–5131
   [Google Scholar]
4. Van Steeg H, Kasperaitis M, Voorma HO, Benne R. Infection of neuroblastoma cells by Semliki Forest virus: the interference of viral capsid protein with the binding of host messenger RNAs into initiation complexes is the cause of the shut-off of host protein synthesis. Eur J Biochem 1984; 138:473–478
   [Google Scholar]
5. Elgizoli M, Dai Y, Kempf C, Koblet H, Michel MR. Semliki Forest virus capsid protein acts as a pleiotropic regulator of host cellular protein synthesis. J Virol 1989; 63:2921–2928
   [Google Scholar]
6. Jakob R. Nucleolar accumulation of C protein in cells naturally infected with Semliki Forest virus. Quantitative Aspects. Virus Res 1993; 30:145–160
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bomsel M, Parton R, Kuznetsov SA, Schroer TA, Gruenberg J. Microtubule- and motor-dependent fusion in vitro between apical and basolateral endocytic vesicles from MDCK cells. Cell 1990; 62:719–731
   [Google Scholar]
8. Herman B, Albertini DF. A time-lapse video image intensification analysis of cytoplasmic organelle movements during endosome translocation. J Cell Biol 1984; 98:565–576
   [Google Scholar]
9. Matteoni R, Kreis TE. Translocation and clustering of endo-somes and lysosomes depends on microtubules. J Cell Biol 1987; 105:1253–1265
   [Google Scholar]
10. De Brabander M, Nuydens R, Geerts H, Hopkins CR. Dynamic behavior of the transferrin receptor followed in living epidermoid carcinoma (A43 1) cells with nanovid microscopy. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 1988; 9:30–47
    [Google Scholar]
11. Matsuuchi L, Buckley KM, Lowe AW, Kelly RB. Targeting of secretory vesicles to cytoplasmic domains in AtT-20 and PC-12 cells. J Cell Biol 1988; 106:239–251
    [Google Scholar]
12. Newmeyer DD, Forbes DJ. An N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive cytosolic factor necessary for nuclear protein import : requirement in signal-mediated binding to nuclear pore. J Cell Biol 1990; 110:547–557
    [Google Scholar]
13. Kaariainen L, Gomatos PJ. A kinetic analysis of the synthesis in BHK 21 cells of RNAs specific for Semliki Forest virus. J Gen Virol 1969; 5:251–265
    [Google Scholar]
14. Omar A, Koblet H. One-step separation of the components of Semliki Forest virus by cation exchange chromatography. J Virol Methods 1985; 12:71–83
    [Google Scholar]
15. Weber K, Osborn M. Proteins and sodium dodecyl sulfate : molecular weight determination on polyacrylamide gels and related procedures. Neurath H, Hill RL. The proteins, 3. 1 New York: Academic Press; 1975179–223
    [Google Scholar]
16. Towbin H, Staehelin T, Gordon J. Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets : procedure and some applications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1979; 76:4350–4354
    [Google Scholar]
17. Bre M-H, Kreis TE, Karsenti E. Control of microtubule nucleation and stability in Madin-Darby canine kidney cells : the occurrence of noncentrosomal, stable detyrosinated microtubules. J Cell Biol 1987; 105:1283–1296
    [Google Scholar]
18. Vega-Salas DE, Salas PJI, Gundersen D, Rodriguez- Boulan E. Formation of the apical pole of epithelial (Madin-Darby canine kidney) cells: polarity of an apical protein is independent of tight junctions while segregation of a basolateral marker requires cell-cell interactions. J Cell Biol 1987; 104:905–916
    [Google Scholar]
19. Zieve GW, Turnbull D, Mullins JM, Mclntosh JR. Production of large numbers of mitotic mammalian cells by use of the reversible microtubule inhibitor nocodazole. Exp Cell Res 1980; 126:397–405
    [Google Scholar]
20. Orias E, Flacks M. Use of genomic exclusion to isolate heat-sensitive mutants in tetrahymena. Genetics 1973; 73:543–559
    [Google Scholar]
21. Sonneborn TM. Recent advances in the genetics of paramecium and euplotes. Ado Genet 1974; 1:263–358
    [Google Scholar]
22. Richardson WD, Mills AD, Dilworth SM, Laskey RA, Ding- wall C. Nuclear protein migration involves two steps: rapid binding at the nuclear envelope followed by slower translocation through nuclear pores. Cell 1988; 52:655–664
    [Google Scholar]
23. Michel MR, Elgizoli M, Koblet H, Kempf C. Diffusion loading conditions determine recovery of protein synthesis in electroporated P3X63Ag8 cells. Experientia 1988; 44:199–203
    [Google Scholar]
24. Feldherr CM, Akin D. The permeability of the nuclear envelope in dividing and ncndividing cell cultures. J Cell Biol 1990; 111:1–8
    [Google Scholar]
25. Rigaut KD, Birk DE, Lenard J. Intracellular distribution of input vesicular stomatitis virus proteins after uncoating. J Virol 1991; 65:2622–2628
    [Google Scholar]
26. Singh I, Helenius A. Role of ribosomes in Semliki Forest virus nucleocapsid uncoating. J Virol 1992; 66:7049–7058
    [Google Scholar]